perm filename INVENT[SJM,JMC] blob
sn#818001 filedate 1986-05-24 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 IS THERE ANYTHING REVOLUTIONARY LEFT TO INVENT?
C00032 ENDMK
Cā;
IS THERE ANYTHING REVOLUTIONARY LEFT TO INVENT?
There is a widespread idea that the possibility of improving
human life qualitatively by invention has been exhausted. For
example, Dennis Gabor, the inventor of holography, in his book
"Innovations, Scientific, Technological, and Social" says as a
preface to his list of future innovations,
``In fact, the list below
consists almost exclusively of improvements, not the first
fulfillments of archetypal wishes such as the first telephone or the
first flying machine was. This is due not merely to the lack of
imagination of the author and his sources, but mainly to the
exhaustion of primitive desires by past inventions. There remain some
primitive wishes such as ESP (Extra-sensory perception, for direct
communication from mind to mind), telekinetics (moving objects by
wishing), the time machine, antigravitics, and super-photonic speed
(breaking through the light velocity barrier), but on all present
evidence these will remain in science fiction - until even SF becomes
tired of them.''
I expect to show in this article that Gabor and his sources
do lack imagination, and that there is plenty of new technology
possible that will make qualitative improvements in people's lives of
at least the same magnitude as those of the last 100 years. The
contrary impression comes from the fact that simple mechanical
invention unassisted by computing exhausted its easy possibilities in
the 1920's. Subsequent inventions have been harder and more
expensive, and some problems have been unsolvable to purely mechanical
invention --- i.e. they require computers.
However, recent developments in science and technology
provide a solid basis for a new wave of inventions that will meet
real human needs and desires.
WHAT HUMAN NEEDS MIGHT INVENTION MEET?
1. Everyone would like to be assured of a comfortable income
independent of whether he can or wants to work. The country is too
poor now to assure this. The presently defined poverty level of
UPDATE THE POVERTY AND AVERAGE NUMBERS
$3400 per family is about 1/3 the average income of $10000 and it is
too low for comfort. Perhaps $5000 might be enough, but this could
not be offered independent of working because present society depends
on the work of too many people whose incomes are so low that $5000
without working would seem better. If we had an average of $25000 at
present prices, we could afford $5000 without work. To do this
requires cost reduction in service industries because the non-workers
would require more services than the rest of society would be willing
to supply.
The benefit of an assured income would be that a person could
take his time about choosing a career, people who cannot stand jobs
would not be driven to hustling and crime, and there would be a limit
to the unattractiveness of the jobs people could be got to do.
Of course, there is a possibility that this would work out
unsuccesfully. The amount society could afford mightn't be enough,
or maybe many of the subsidized people would be just as unhappy
and make just as much trouble for others no matter what the subsidy.
The biggest fear is that politicians wouldn't bring themselves to
deny the vote to people living on subsidy, and they would become
an interest group whose self-appointed
representatives would always be
maneuvering politically to increase the subsidy.
Judicious experimentation might be required to determine the actual
effects.
2. Reduction of housework below the irritation level. The
reduction of housework by mechanical inventions has made possible the
nuclear family and the independent living of single people. People
who can't get along with each other can now live apart. As a
believer in human freedom, I count this good. Nevertheless, when
people live together, housework produces stresses as anyone who has
lived in a commune will tell you. One common solution
to this problem is for women to devote their lives to housework. Some
of them would rather not do so and still have families.
3. Reduction of the age of achieving independence. Present
society is based on keeping people under rather close discipline by
parents and school until the age of 18. Lesser strings bind people
for several years more. It may be possible to reduce the age of
independence eventually to 15 without adverse effects. An obvious
requirement for this is either to shorten the 12 years of school or
make it more attractive. Another is simply the wealth to allow
people to set up house younger.
4. The ability to remain independent to a later age.
5. Assurance of a socially useful job using one's talents.
6. The ability to obtain an object when one wants it. Thus I
can't get a new chess set here at the lab in the next two minutes at
2:30AM. I don't agree that it is unreasonable of me to want it.
7. The ability to get one of a technically feasible new
object without someone deciding to mass produce it. Thus I can't get
a temperature controlled suit I have invented, and it would be quite
expensive to get a hi-fi cabinet built to my specifications.
8. The ability to get information quickly. I could have put
one of my previous points more cogently if I could have got income
statistics on demand.
9. The ability to change government policy if I have a good
idea. I cannot find the precise rationale of the present policy, I
can't objectively determine the effects of the alternate policy, and
I have no way of getting the authorities to pay attention to my idea
even if it is a good one. Yes, Virginia, technology can even help
with this.
10. Children should be able to wander anywhere they want in
perfect safety and retrievability.
11. We should be able to rebuild cities and families should
be able to rebuild their dwellings when they no longer meet current
needs.
I hope the reader will agree that these are non-trivial human
wants and that our society would be qualitatively changed by
realizing them. The list is certainly not exhaustive, and you could
probably persuade me that some I have not thought of are amenable to
technological solution and more important than some of the above. I
have not included avoiding any kind of disasters in the above list,
because that is another subject.
HOW DO WE GET THERE FROM HERE?
The technological innovations discussed below are not in
one-to-one correspondence with the above needs, i.e. there is not one
gadget for each problem. This is because the innovations have to be
looked at from the point of view of opportunity rather than need. In
fact, we must work back and forth between problems, scientific laws,
products, and systems.
1. Inventions that merely increase the productivity of
present activities are still very important. Thus, although
agriculture now occupies only 5 percent of workers, they work harder
than average; to give them good working conditions without increasing
their number will require a large increase in productivity.
Productivity of industrial labor has been the traditional focus of
much engineering effort, although for historical reasons it has not
been the subject of much academic engineering effort. Research in
improving industrial productivity has been carried out by individual
producers for their own benefit and by makers of machinery. This
needs to be changed and has been changing in the last 10 years.
2. If the costs of construction could be reduced by a factor
of three, we could rebuild our cities, and families could rebuild
their houses. Productivity in construction has increased much more
slowly than in manufacturing largely because buildings really have to
be different from each other. Computers make it possible to go from
the architects computer prepared plans for a building automatically
to an automatic fabrication machine that makes sub-assemblies of the
building and also to a "Heathkit" manual for putting the building
together. Construction is another area in which the development has
been done almost entirely by machine sellers and in connection with
particular projects. Fifteen
years ago it looked like this situation might change, because
the Department of Housing and Urban Development had the
beginnings of a research and development program. Alas, this effort
collapsed, whether because of politics or technological inadequacy
I'm not sure, but I suspect the former.
The construction
robot is also a possibility in the next twenty years.
3. The biggest area for increase in productivity is in
services. Think of all those tall buildings in San Francisco and New
York full of people passing each other papers. What do they all do?
Is it really necessary, and can't most of it be replaced by
computers? I certainly have no clear picture of the office industry
as a whole, but it is clear that much of the work involved in
interdepartmental and even
inter-firm transactions can be done computer-to-computer without
human labor.
5. A major possibility is an automatic delivery system. The
idea of such a system has been around for close to 100 years, but
every generation has to examine its economic feasibility. I don't
know whether it is feasible yet, but there is a good chance of it
especially in connection with computer technology and reductions in
construction costs.
Imagine the following: When you subscribe to the service
workmen arrive and cut a hole in the wall under or next to a window
and install a delivery port of the size you have agreed to pay for.
On the outside wall of the building is installed a rail or possibly
just a set of "handholds" which lead to a hole in the ground with an
eight foot shield around it and a rain lid on top. The hole leads to
a passage under the street with a rail attached to its ceiling
attached to which carriers of different sizes can ride. When the
appropriate numbers are dialed, checks are made by a computer for the
sending and receiving ports not being full, a carrier comes to the
sending port, is loaded, proceeds through the system, arrives at the
receiving port and waits to be unloaded. The carrier is powered
through the rail while under the street and is battery powered while
climbing the building. This may not be the best scheme, but it will
probably work. Whether it is economically feasible now, I don't
know.
In connection with home computer consoles and automated money
transfer, this will save great amounts of labor and will provide
great direct benefits, for example: it will deliver the mail, it will
permit the purchase of an article and its delivery in minutes at any
time of the day or night, it will take the trash away, it will
obviate the need to own many articles because they will be obtainable
for rent in minutes, it will take objects away to be stored until
wanted again, and it will enable people to share things they own in
common.
6. Computer control of cars will have the following advantages:
accidents will be reduced by at least a factor of 10 before computer
control of cars will even be acceptable; children and old people will not
be dependent on others to drive them; the capacity of highway systems will be
increased without new construction, because cars will be able to go bumper to
bumper on the highway at 80 miles per hour without danger; it will be
possible to have the car park itself and come back when required; and it will
be possible to send a car on an errand.
7. Computer control of manufacturing processes will make
possible the economical construction of unique objects even going as
far as a car built to individual specifications. Machine tools
controlled by computer prepared tapes have already reduced the cost
of one-of-a-kind machining. Computer aided design will make
economical the design of a one-of-a-kind object with assurance that
the object will serve its purpose without extensive testing. First
steps have already been made in this direction.
8. Surveillance of streets by TV cameras that store what they
see and make it viewable only in case of trouble will make the
streets safe. (The problem at present is not so much that walking
the streets reduces one's life expectancy, but that fear of robbers,
muggers, and sex criminals reduces the freedom of women, children,
and many men.) Elimination of money will eliminate much crime. (A
robber will have to demand that his victim transfer $1,000 to account
558304793!) Crime prevention technology must be implemented in such a
way that civil rights are increased rather than reduced. Thus, the
convenience of the police cannot be the only criterion.
9. The home computer console makes possible an information
system with the following possibilities: all published matter in the
world is immediately accessible; anyone can publish anything simply
by declaring it publicly available; buyers can use programs to get
best buys and negotiate with sellers obviating some of the effects of
advertising; the rationales of government and other institutional
policies can be made publicly available and updated.
Techniques that are being developed in connection with
research in artificial intelligence to express in formal languages
the kinds of assertions now made in natural language. When such
systems are well understood it should be possible to express the
presumptions of a policy and prove that the policy will achieve its
goal avoiding undesired side-effects and with some figure of merit.
When such rationalizations are available to everyone, anyone who
understands the technique will have the opportunity to see if an
altered policy will produce a better result and, if so, to propose
it. Having a proof that a new policy is better will be a big step
towards getting it adopted.
10. Quite soon we shall be able to have a national juke box
using the Telephone Company's Picturephone circuits for a purpose
they have not yet mentioned. Namely, a central file will have all
published recorded music, and a subscriber will be able to dial any
piece for immediate play.
The developments mentioned above differ greatly in their
difficulty and in the length of time that may be required to overcome
the difficulties. My intention is not to predict in the sense of
futurology, but rather to point out that there are worthwhile goals
that technology can contribute to. Thus, students who wish to
contribute to the welfare of humanity will probably do more good by
becoming engineers or scientists than by becoming lawyers or
politicians.
In future articles, I hope to discuss whether the natural
resources exist to support the even more technological civilization
that I advocate, how we can put more effort into technology that will
really benefit humanity, and also what has to be done to solve a few
of the specific problems mentioned above.